Assessment of common extensor tendon vascularization using superb microvascular imaging: a potential tool in the evaluation of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and therapeutic ultrasound effectiveness in lateral epicondylitis.

BACKGROUND: Lateral epicondylitis, also known as tennis elbow, is the most common elbow pain in the adult age group. PURPOSE: To evaluate common extensor tendon (CET) vascularity with superb microvascular imaging (SMI) before and after extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and ultrasound (US) treatment in patients with lateral epycondylitis and to compare the effects of two different treatments on tendon vascularity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with lateral epycondylitis were divided into two groups; 30 patients were treated with ESWT (group 1) and 30 patients were treated with therapeutic US (group 2). We performed a high-frequency (14-MHz) linear array transducer to evaluate tendon anatomy and vascularity before and after treatment in both groups. RESULTS: The decrease in Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) score after treatment was statistically significant compared to pre-treatment for both groups (P < 0.001). Likewise, the decrease in visual analog scale (VAS) score after treatment was statistically significant compared to pre-treatment for both groups (P < 0.001). A significant difference was found between the CET SMI values of group 1 and group 2 after treatment, according to the chi-square test (P < 0.001). In the post-treatment VAS and PRTEE comparison of both groups, the score reduction in group 1 was higher than in group 2, and this decrease was statistically significant (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We can evaluate CET vascularization with the SMI method as a new potential diagnostic tool in comparing the effectiveness of different treatments in cases of lateral epicondylitis.

A hydrogen peroxide economizer for on-demand oxygen production-assisted robust sonodynamic immunotherapy.

The outcome of sonodynamic immunotherapy is significantly limited by tumor hypoxia. To overcome this obstacle, one common solution is to catalyze the conversion of endogenous H2O2 into O2. However, the effectiveness of this strategy is limited by the insufficient concentration of H2O2 in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Herein, we developed a H2O2 economizer for on-demand O2 supply and sonosensitizer-mediated reactive oxygen species production during ultrasound activation, thereby alleviating hypoxia-associated limitations and augmenting the efficacy of sonodynamic immunotherapy. Methods: The H2O2 economizer is constructed by electrostatic adsorption and π-π interactions between the Fe-doped polydiaminopyridine (Fe-PDAP) nanozyme and chlorin e6. By employing a biomimetic engineering strategy with cancer cell membranes, we addressed the premature leakage issue and increased tumor-site accumulation of nanoparticles (membrane-coated Fe-PDAP/Ce6, MFC). Results: The prepared MFC could significantly attenuate the catalytic activity of Fe-PDAP by reducing their contact with H2O2. Ultrasound irradiation promoted MFC dissociation and the exposure of Fe-PDAP for a more robust O2 supply. Moreover, the combination of MFC-enhanced sonodynamic therapy with anti-programmed cell death protein-1 antibody (aPD-1) immune checkpoint blockade induced a strong antitumor response against both primary tumors and distant tumors. Conclusion: This as-prepared H2O2 economizer significantly alleviates tumor hypoxia via reducing H2O2 expenditure and that on-demand oxygen-elevated sonodynamic immunotherapy can effectively combat tumors.

Acquisition of Basic Micro-Neurosurgical Skills Using Cavitron Ultrasonic Aspirator in Low-Cost Readily Available Models: The Egg Model.

BACKGROUND: Attainment of micro-neurosurgical skills is a challenge in teaching hospitals throughout training. Models that mimic the workflow as well as haptics are time-consuming, expensive, and unsuitable to serve as a routine platform. Our objective was to present a model and a set of tasks, based on a hard-boiled egg, microscope, and a Cavitron ultrasonic aspirator (CUSA; Integra Lifesciences Corp., Tullamore, Ireland), which is cheap, easy to setup and can be used for training microsurgery and CUSA skills, required for removal of deep-seated tumors. METHODS: The goal was to remove the egg yolk from within a hard-boiled egg, representing an intrinsic brain tumor, surrounded by the egg's white, representing adjacent brain tissue, while preserving it. Assessment was based on the yolk's exposure, completeness of removal, and collateral damage and task completion duration, with repeated trials (n = 4), for validation purposes, for 6 operators with different experience levels. RESULTS: Improvement in overall score (mean of 47.5 ± 19 in the first trial vs. 80.0 ± 12 in the fourth trial, P < 0.01), and task duration completion (mean initial duration of 21:25 ± 4:52 minutes to 15:30 ± 5:17 minutes, P < 0.01) was observed. Parameters gradually improved on repeated attempts, and experience level of the operators correlated with scores. CONCLUSIONS: The egg model is an easy-to-handle, cheap model that enables the acquisition of basic micro-neurosurgical skills and basic workflow required for removing of intrinsic brain tumors. This study has validated and defined reproducible tasks that can be scored, correlated with performance. This model can be incorporated into a resident's routine and potentially provide an accessible training platform for neurosurgical trainees.

Sustained acoustic medicine as a non-surgical and non-opioid knee osteoarthritis treatment option: a health economic cost-effectiveness analysis for symptom management.

BACKGROUND: Patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis (OA) and presenting with symptoms are seeking conservative treatment options to reduce pain, improve function, and avoid surgery. Sustained acoustic medicine (SAM), a multi-hour treatment has demonstrated improved clinical outcomes for patients with knee OA. The purpose of this analysis was to compare the costs and effectiveness of multi-hour SAM treatment versus the standard of care (SOC) over a 6-month timeframe for OA symptom management. METHODS: A decision tree analysis was used to compare the costs and effectiveness of SAM treatment versus SOC in patients with OA. Probabilities of success for OA treatment and effectiveness were derived from the literature using systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Costs were derived from Medicare payment rates and manufacturer prices. Functional effectiveness was measured as the effect size of a therapy and treatment pathways compared to a SOC treatment pathway. A sensitivity analysis was performed to determine which cost variables had the greatest effect on deciding which option was the least costly. An incremental cost-effectiveness plot comparing SAM treatment vs. SOC was also generated using 1000 iterations of the model. Lastly, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated as the (cost of SAM minus cost of SOC) divided by (functional effectiveness of SAM minus functional effectiveness of SOC). RESULTS: Base case demonstrated that over 6 months, the cost and functional effectiveness of SAM was $8641 and 0.52 versus SOC at: $6281 and 0.39, respectively. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that in order for SAM to be the less expensive option, the cost per 15-min session of PT would need to be greater than $88, or SAM would need to be priced at less than or equal to $2276. Incremental cost-effectiveness demonstrated that most of the time (84%) SAM treatment resulted in improved functional effectiveness but at a higher cost than SOC. CONCLUSION: In patients with osteoarthritis, SAM treatment demonstrated improved pain and functional gains compared to SOC but at an increased cost. Based on the SAM treatment ICER score being ≤ $50,000, it appears that SAM is a cost-effective treatment for knee OA.

From Anatomy to Functional and Molecular Biomarker Imaging and Therapy: Ultrasound Is Safe, Ultrafast, Portable, and Inexpensive.

Ultrasound is the most widely used medical imaging modality worldwide. It is abundant, extremely safe, portable, and inexpensive. In this review, we consider some of the current development trends for ultrasound imaging, which build upon its current strength and the popularity it experiences among medical imaging professional users.Ultrasound has rapidly expanded beyond traditional radiology departments and cardiology practices. Computing power and data processing capabilities of commonly available electronics put ultrasound systems in a lab coat pocket or on a user's mobile phone. Taking advantage of new contributions and discoveries in ultrasound physics, signal processing algorithms, and electronics, the performance of ultrasound systems and transducers have progressed in terms of them becoming smaller, with higher imaging performance, and having lower cost. Ultrasound operates in real time, now at ultrafast speeds; kilohertz frame rates are already achieved by many systems.Ultrasound has progressed beyond anatomical imaging and monitoring blood flow in large vessels. With clinical approval of ultrasound contrast agents (gas-filled microbubbles) that are administered in the bloodstream, tissue perfusion studies are now routine. Through the use of modern ultrasound pulse sequences, individual microbubbles, with subpicogram mass, can be detected and observed in real time, many centimeters deep in the body. Ultrasound imaging has broken the wavelength barrier; by tracking positions of microbubbles within the vasculature, superresolution imaging has been made possible. Ultrasound can now trace the smallest vessels and capillaries, and obtain blood velocity data in those vessels.Molecular ultrasound imaging has now moved closer to clinic; the use of microbubbles with a specific affinity to endothelial biomarkers allows selective accumulation and retention of ultrasound contrast in the areas of ischemic injury, inflammation, or neoangiogenesis. This will aid in noninvasive molecular imaging and may provide additional help with real-time guidance of biopsy, surgery, and ablation procedures.The ultrasound field can be tightly focused inside the body, many centimeters deep, with millimeter precision, and ablate lesions by energy deposition, with thermal or mechanical bioeffects. Some of such treatments are already in clinical use, with more indications progressing through the clinical trial stage. In conjunction with intravascular microbubbles, focused ultrasound can be used for tissue-specific drug delivery; localized triggered release of sequestered drugs from particles in the bloodstream may take time to get to clinic. A combination of intravascular microbubbles with circulating drug and low-power ultrasound allows transient opening of vascular endothelial barriers, including blood-brain barrier; this approach has reached clinical trial stage. Therefore, the drugs that normally would not be getting to the target tissue in the brain will now have an opportunity to produce therapeutic efficacy.Overall, medical ultrasound is developing at a brisk rate, even in an environment where other imaging modalities are also advancing rapidly and may be considered more lucrative. With all the current advances that we discuss, and many more to come, ultrasound may help solve many problems that modern medicine is facing.

In silico feasibility assessment of extracorporeal delivery of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound to intervertebral discs within the lumbar spine.

Low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) may have utility for non-invasive treatment of discogenic lower back pain through stimulating, remodeling and accelerating healing of injured or degenerated intervertebral disc (IVD) tissues. This study investigates the feasibility of delivering LIPUS to lumbar IVDs between L2 and S1 spine vertebra using a planar extracorporeal phased array (8 × 8 cm, 1024 elements, 500 kHz). Three 3D anatomical models with heterogenous tissues were generated from patient CT image sets and used in the simulation-based analysis. Time-reversal acoustic modeling techniques were applied to optimize posterior-lateral placement of the array with respect to the body to facilitate energy deposition in discrete target regions spanning the annulus fibrosus and central nucleus of each IVD. Forward acoustic and biothermal simulations were performed with time-reversal optimized array placements and driving amplitude/phase settings to predict LIPUS intensity distributions at target sites and to investigate off-target energy deposition and heating potential. Simulation results demonstrate focal intensity gain of 5-168 across all IVD targets and anatomical models, with greater average intensity gain (>50) and energy localization in posterior, posterolateral, and lateral target sites of IVDs. Localized LIPUS delivery was enhanced in thinner patient anatomies and in the high lumbar levels (L2-L3 and L3-L4). Multiple amplitude/phasing illumination patterns could be sequenced at a fixed array position for larger regional energy coverage in the IVD. Biothermal simulations demonstrated that LIPUS-appropriate exposures of 100 mW cm-2 ISPTA to the target disc region would result in <1 °C global peak temperature elevation for all cases. Hence, simulations suggest that spatially-precise extracorporeal delivery of therapeutically relevant LIPUS doses to discrete regions of lumbar IVDs is feasible and may be useful in clinical management of discogenic back pain.

Spatiotemporal Assessment of the Cellular Safety of Cavitation-Based Therapies by Passive Acoustic Mapping.

Many useful therapeutic bio-effects can be generated using ultrasound-induced cavitation. However, cavitation is also capable of causing unwanted cellular and vascular damage, which should be monitored to ensure treatment safety. In this work, the unique opportunity provided by passive acoustic mapping (PAM) to quantify cavitation dose across an entire volume of interest during therapy is utilised to provide setup-independent measures of spatially localised cavitation dose. This spatiotemporally quantifiable cavitation dose is then related to the level of cellular damage generated. The cavitation-mediated destruction of equine red blood cells mixed with one of two types of cavitation nuclei at a variety of concentrations is investigated. The blood is placed within a 0.5-MHz ultrasound field and exposed to a range of peak rarefactional pressures up to 2 MPa, with 50 to 50,000 cycle pulses maintaining a 5% duty cycle. Two co-planar linear arrays at 90° to each other are used to generate 400-µm-resolution frequency domain robust capon beamforming PAM maps, which are then used to generate estimates of cavitation dose. A relationship between this cavitation dose and the levels of haemolysis generated was found which was comparable regardless of the applied acoustic pressure, pulse length, cavitation agent type or concentration used. PAM was then used to monitor cellular damage in multiple locations within a tissue phantom simultaneously, with the damage-cavitation dose relationship being similar for the two experimental models tested. These results lay the groundwork for this method to be applied to other measures of safety, allowing for improved ultrasound monitoring of cavitation-based therapies.

Aspirador ultrasónico para manejo de tumores cerebrales / Ultrasonic aspirator for brain tumor management

INTRODUCCIÓN: Este documento técnico se realiza a solicitud del Instituto Nacional de Salud del Niño - San Borja. A. Cuadro clínico: Los tumores cerebrales pueden ser primarios (30%) o metastásicos (70%). De todos los tumores primarios, el 40% son benignos y raramente se diseminan fuera del sistema nervioso central (SNC). Los tumores cerebrales metastásicos, en su mayoría, se originan del pulmón, mama, riñón, sistema digestivo y piel (melanoma). El tratamiento depende del tipo de tumor, la histología, la progresión y la localización. Entre estos tratamientos se encuentra la resección quirúrgica, la radiación y la quimioterapia. Existen diferentes tecnologías que se utilizan para la resección de tumores cerebrales, entre ellas se encuentra el aspirador ultrasónico. B. Tecnología sanitaria: El aspirador ultrasónico es un dispositivo que succiona de forma selectiva el tejido tumoral utilizando energía ultrasónica focalizada de gran intensidad. Existen diferentes marcas en el mercado internacional, sin embargo, no se ha podido identificar marcas disponibles en el Perú a través de una fuente oficial. OBJETIVO: Evaluar la eficacia y seguridad, así como documentos relacionados a la decisión de cobertura del aspirador ultrasónico para tumores cerebrales. METODOLOGÍA: Se realizó una búsqueda en las principales bases de datos bibliográficas: MEDLINE, LILACS, COCHRANE, así como en buscadores genéricos de Internet incluyendo Google Scholar y TRIPDATABASE. Adicionalmente, se hizo una búsqueda dentro de la información generada por las principales instituciones internacionales de neurología y neurocirugía de tecnologías sanitarias que realizan revisiones sistemáticas (RS), evaluación de tecnologías sanitarias (ETS) y guías de práctica clínica (GPC). RESULTADOS: No se identificaron ensayos clínicos aleatorizados, revisiones sistemáticas o estudios observacionales que proporcionaran datos comparativos de la tecnología de interés versus el comparador. Complementariamente, se identificaron tres series de casos y un estudio de opinión de experto acerca de la experiencia utilizando la tecnología en una institución. CONCLUSIONES: La evidencia con respecto al uso del aspirador ultrasónico para el manejo de tumores cerebrales es escasa. Si bien no se identificó estudios comparativos del uso de esta tecnología, existen series de casos que evidencian éxito en la remoción de tejido tumoral sin reportar lesiones en los vasos sanguíneos o los nervios en la zona de la intervención. No se han reportado eventos adversos severos asociados al uso de esta tecnología. Las guías de práctica clínica recabadas recomiendan la extirpación de tumores según sea el caso, pero no especifican una técnica quirúrgica preferencial para el procedimiento. No se identificaron evaluaciones de tecnología sanitaria ni evaluaciones económicas que evalúen a la tecnología.

Cost-minimisation model of magnetic resonance-guided focussed ultrasound therapy compared to unilateral deep brain stimulation for essential tremor treatment in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cost differences between magnetic resonance-guided focussed ultrasound (MRgFUS) and unilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the treatment of medication-refractory essential tremor (ET) in Japan using a cost-minimisation model. METHODS: A cost-minimisation model estimated total costs for MRgFUS and unilateral DBS by summing the pre-procedure, procedure, and post-procedure costs over a 12-month time horizon, using data from published sources and expert clinical opinion. The model base case considered medical costs from fee-for-service tariffs. Scenario analyses investigated the use of Diagnosis Procedure Combination tariffs, a diagnosis-related group-based fixed-payment system, and the addition of healthcare professional labour costs healthcare professionals using tariffs from the Japanese Health Insurance Federation for Surgery. One-way sensitivity analyses altered costs associated with tremor recurrence after MRgFUS, the extraction rate following unilateral DBS, the length of hospitalisation for unilateral DBS and the procedure duration for MRgFUS. The impact of uncertainty in model parameters on the model results was further explored using probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Compared to unilateral DBS, MRgFUS was cost saving in the base case and Diagnosis Procedure Combination cost scenario, with total savings of JPY400,380 and JPY414,691, respectively. The majority of savings were accrued at the procedural stage. Including labour costs further increased the cost differences between MRgFUS and unilateral DBS. Cost savings were maintained in each sensitivity analysis and the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, demonstrating that the model results are highly robust. CONCLUSIONS: In the Japanese healthcare setting, MRgFUS could be a cost saving option versus unilateral DBS for treating medication-refractory ET. The model results may even be conservative, as the cost of multiple follow-ups for unilateral DBS and treatment costs for adverse events associated with each procedure were not included. This model is also consistent with the results of other economic analyses of MRgFUS versus DBS in various settings worldwide.

Quantitative Assessment of Effectiveness of Ultrasonic Propulsion of Kidney Stones.

Purpose: Ultrasonic propulsion is an investigative modality to noninvasively image and reposition urinary stones. Our goals were to test safety and effectiveness of new acoustic exposure conditions from a new transducer, and to use simultaneous ureteroscopic and ultrasonic observation to quantify stone repositioning. Materials and Methods: During operation, ultrasonic propulsion was applied transcutaneously, whereas stone targets were visualized ureteroscopically. Exposures were 350 kHz frequency, ≤200 W/cm2 focal intensity, and ≤3-second bursts per push. Ureteroscope and ultrasound (US) videos were recorded. Video clips with and without stone motion were randomized and scored for motion ≥3 mm by independent reviewers blinded to the exposures. Subjects were followed with telephone calls, imaging, and chart review for adverse events. Results: The investigative treatment was used in 18 subjects and 19 kidneys. A total of 62 stone targets were treated ranging in size from a collection of "dust" to 15 mm. Subjects received an average of 17 ± 14 propulsion bursts (per kidney) for a total average exposure time of 40 ± 40 seconds. Independent reviewers scored at least one stone movement ≥3 mm in 18 of 19 kidneys (95%) from the ureteroscope videos and in 15 of 19 kidneys (79%) from the US videos. This difference was probably because of motion out of the US imaging plane. Treatment repositioned stones in two cases that would have otherwise required basket repositioning. No serious adverse events were observed with the device or procedure. Conclusions: Ultrasonic propulsion was shown to be safe, and it effectively repositioned stones in 95% of kidneys despite positioning and access restrictions caused by working in an operating room on anesthetized subjects.

In-vitro assessment of the thrombolytic efficacy of therapeutic ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound is mainly used as a diagnostic tool. Several studies demonstrated that therapeutic ultrasound (TUS) can enhance thrombolysis, but the optimal mechanical parameters to achieve this biological effect are still unknown. METHODS: We assembled 46 blood clots in a closed in-vitro circulatory model. Clots were randomly divided into 7 groups, control group and six TUS groups of three frequencies (0.3, 0.5, 0.7 MHz) and six intensities (0.75, 1.5, 3, 237.7, 475, 950 W/cm2). Treatment was composed of 12 repetitions, 5 min US application and 3 min pause, lasting 93 min in total. Clots' weight and flow rate were measured before and after the treatment. RESULTS: Mean initial clot weight (0.318 ±â€¯0.129 g) and flow (0.53 ±â€¯0.31 ml/min) were comparable among the experimental groups. We found a final clot weights reduction (0.15 ±â€¯0.05, 0.16 ±â€¯0.06, 0.09 ±â€¯0.07, 0.21 ±â€¯0.09, 0.17 ±â€¯0.09, 0.17 ±â€¯0.07 and 0.18 ±â€¯0.02 g in groups 1 through 6, respectively) and a flow increase (30.61 ±â€¯19.76, 52.1 ±â€¯25.44, 28.78 ±â€¯8.15, 43.93 ±â€¯20.03, 40.86 ±â€¯18.25 and 45.10 ±â€¯22.20 ml/min in groups 1-6, respectively) in all TUS groups. Clot weight change (%) and flow increase reveals that the TUS profile f = 0.5 MHz I = 1.5 W/cm2 was most efficacious. In the control group, clot weight change was +6.3% of baseline and flow increase of 4.4% of baseline, whereas -75.4% of baseline and 209.3% of baseline in the f = 0.5 MHz I = 1.5 W/cm2 profile were noted, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study proved that TUS at low frequency (0.5 MHz) is most effective, whereas changing the intensity of TUS has only a minor effect on clot lysis magnitude.

Assessment of acoustic pulse therapy (APT), a non-antibiotic treatment for dairy cows with clinical and subclinical mastitis.

Clinical and subclinical mastitis affects 30% of cows and is regarded as the most significant economic burden on the dairy farm reducing milk yield and quality and increasing culling rate. A proprietary Acoustic Pulse Therapy (APT) device was developed specifically for treating dairy cows. The APT device was designed to produce deep penetrating acoustic pulses that are distributed over a large treated area at a therapeutic level. This paper presents findings from a clinical assessment of this technology for the treatment of dairy cows with subclinical and clinical mastitis. In subclinical mastitis, a group of 116 cows from 3 herds were identified with subclinical intramammary infection and enrolled in the study; 78 cows were assigned to the treatment group and 38 cows to the control group. Significant differences (P<0.001) were found where 70.5% of the cows in the treatment group returned to normal milk production, compared with only 18.4% of the control group. Daily milk yields of the treated cows increased significantly (P<0.05) and the percentage of cows with log somatic cell count under 5.6 cells/mL was significantly higher (P<0.001). Milk of the infected quarters appeared normal with lactose greater than 4.8%, but this difference was not significant. Of the treated cows with identified bacteria, 52.6% of the quarters were cured, while in the control group only 25.0% (P<0.001). Specifically, all cows identified with Escherichia coli in the treatment group were cured, with 66.6% cured with no intervention in the control. Spontaneous cure of glands infected with coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS) and Streptococci was low while treatment successfully increased the cure of CNS from 13.3% to 53.8% and that of Streptococci from 18.2% to 36.4%. Of the 4 cows identified with Staphylococcus aureus, 3 were cured. The clinical mastitis study group included 29 infected cows that were submitted either to a gold standard antibiotic treatment subgroup of 16 cows (n = 16) or to an APT treatment subgroup of 13 cows (n = 13). A cure of 18.7% was shown for the antibiotic treatment, of which logSCC returned to <5.6 cell/mL and 56.2% were culled. A cure of 76.9% was shown for the APT treatment with only one cow culled (7.7%).

Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound Neurosurgery for Essential Tremor: A Health Technology Assessment.

BACKGROUND: The standard treatment option for medication-refractory essential tremor is invasive neurosurgery. A new, noninvasive alternative is magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) neurosurgery. We aimed to determine the effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of MRgFUS neurosurgery for the treatment of moderate to severe, medication-refractory essential tremor in Ontario. We also spoke with people with essential tremor to gain an understanding of their experiences and thoughts regarding treatment options, including MRgFUS neurosurgery. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the clinical literature published up to April 11, 2017, that examined MRgFUS neurosurgery alone or compared with other interventions for the treatment of moderate to severe, medication-refractory essential tremor. We assessed the risk of bias of each study and the quality of the body of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria. We performed a systematic review of the economic literature and created Markov cohort models to assess the cost-effectiveness of MRgFUS neurosurgery compared with other treatment options, including no surgery. We also estimated the budget impact of publicly funding MRgFUS neurosurgery in Ontario for the next 5 years. To contextualize the potential value of MRgFUS neurosurgery as a treatment option for essential tremor, we spoke with people with essential tremor and their families. RESULTS: Nine studies met our inclusion criteria for the clinical evidence review. In noncomparative studies, MRgFUS neurosurgery was found to significantly improve tremor severity and quality of life and to significantly reduce functional disability (GRADE: very low). It was also found to be significantly more effective than a sham procedure (GRADE: high). We found no significant difference in improvements in tremor severity, functional disability, or quality of life between MRgFUS neurosurgery and deep brain stimulation (GRADE: very low). We found no significant difference in improvement in tremor severity compared with radiofrequency thalamotomy (GRADE: low). MRgFUS neurosurgery has a favourable safety profile.We estimated that MRgFUS neurosurgery has a mean cost of $23,507 and a mean quality-adjusted survival of 3.69 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). We also estimated that the mean costs and QALYs of radiofrequency thalamotomy and deep brain stimulation are $14,978 and 3.61 QALYs, and $57,535 and 3.94 QALYs, respectively. For people ineligible for invasive neurosurgery, we estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of MRgFUS neurosurgery compared with no surgery as $43,075 per QALY gained. In people eligible for invasive neurosurgery, the ICER of MRgFUS neurosurgery compared with radiofrequency thalamotomy is $109,795 per QALY gained; when deep brain stimulation is compared with MRgFUS neurosurgery, the ICER is $134,259 per QALY gained. Of note however, radiofrequency thalamotomy is performed very infrequently in Ontario. We also estimated that the budget impact of publicly funding MRgFUS neurosurgery in Ontario at the current case load (i.e., 48 cases/year) would be about $1 million per year for the next 5 years.People with essential tremor who had undergone MRgFUS neurosurgery reported positive experiences with the procedure. The tremor reduction they experienced improved their ability to perform activities of daily living and improved their quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: MRgFUS neurosurgery is an effective and generally safe treatment option for moderate to severe, medication-refractory essential tremor. It provides a treatment option for people ineligible for invasive neurosurgery and offers a noninvasive option for all people considering neurosurgery.For people ineligible for invasive neurosurgery, MRgFUS neurosurgery is cost-effective compared with no surgery. In people eligible for invasive neurosurgery, MRgFUS neurosurgery may be one of several reasonable options. Publicly funding MRgFUS neurosurgery for the treatment of moderate to severe, medication-refractory essential tremor in Ontario at the current case load would have a net budget impact of about $1 million per year for the next 5 years.People with essential tremor who had undergone MRgFUS neurosurgery reported positive experiences. They liked that it was a noninvasive procedure and reported a substantial reduction in tremor that resulted in an improvement in their quality of life.

Echocardiographic assessment with right ventricular function improvement following ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy in submassive pulmonary embolism.

Introduction The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy in patients with submassive pulmonary embolism. Methods Clinical records of 46 patients with submassive pulmonary embolism who underwent ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed pulmonary thrombolysis using tissue plasminogen activator, from 2007 to 2017, were analyzed. All patients experienced clinical symptoms with computed tomography evidence of pulmonary thrombus burden. Right ventricular dysfunction was present in all patients by echocardiographic finding of right ventricle-to-left ventricle ratio > 0.9. Treatment outcome, procedural complications, right ventricular pressures, and thrombus clearance were evaluated. Follow-up evaluation included echocardiographic assessment of right ventricle-to-left ventricle ratio at one month, six months, and one year. Results Technical success was achieved in all patients ( n = 46, 100%). Our patients received an average of 18.4 ± 4.7 mg of tissue plasminogen activator using ultrasound-accelerated thrombolytic catheter with an average infusion time of 16.5± 5.4 h. Clinical success was achieved in all patients (100%). Significant reduction of mean pulmonary artery pressure occurred following the treatment, which decreased from 36 ± 8 to 21 ± 5 mmHg ( p < 0.001). There were no major bleeding complications. All-cause mortality at 30 days was 0%. No patient developed recurrent pulmonary embolism during follow-up. During the follow-up period, 43 patients (93%) showed improvement of right ventricular dysfunction based on echocardiographic assessment. The right ventricle-to-left ventricle ratio decreased from 1.32 ± 0.18 to 0.91 ± 0.13 at the time of hospital discharge ( p < 0.01). The right ventricular function remained improved at 6 months and 12 months of follow-up, as right ventricle-to-left ventricle ratio were 0.92 ± 0.14 ( p < 0.01) and 0.91 ± 0.15 ( p < 0.01), respectively. Conclusion Ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis is a safe and efficacious treatment for submassive pulmonary embolism. It reduces pulmonary hypertension and improves right ventricular function in patients with submassive pulmonary embolism.

Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for treatment of tibial fractures: an economic evaluation of the TRUST study.

AIMS: This 501-patient, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial sought to establish the effect of low-intensity, pulsed, ultrasound (LIPUS) on tibial shaft fractures managed with intramedullary nailing. We conducted an economic evaluation as part of this trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data for patients' use of post-operative healthcare resources and time taken to return to work were collected and costed using publicly available sources. Health-related quality of life, assessed using the Health Utilities Index Mark-3 (HUI-3), was used to derive quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Costs and QALYs were compared between LIPUS and control (a placebo device) from a payer and societal perspective using non-parametric bootstrapping. All costs are reported in 2015 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated. RESULTS: With a cost per device of $3,995, the mean cost was significantly higher for patients treated with LIPUS versus placebo from a payer (mean increase = $3647, 95% confidence interval (CI) $3244 to $4070; p < 0.001) or a societal perspective (mean increase = $3425, 95% CI $1568 to $5283; p < 0.001). LIPUS did not provide a significant benefit in terms of QALYs gained (mean difference = 0.023 QALYs, 95% CI -0.035 to 0.069; p = 0.474). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of LIPUS compared with placebo were $155 433/QALY from a payer perspective and $146 006/QALY from a societal perspective. CONCLUSION: At the current price, LIPUS is not cost-effective for fresh tibial fractures managed with intramedullary nailing. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1526-32.

Therapeutic ultrasound for venous leg ulcers.

BACKGROUND: Venous leg ulcers are a type of chronic, recurring, complex wound that is more common in people aged over 65 years. Venous ulcers pose a significant burden to patients and healthcare systems. While compression therapy (such as bandages or stockings) is an effective first-line treatment, ultrasound may have a role to play in healing venous ulcers. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether venous leg ulcers treated with ultrasound heal more quickly than those not treated with ultrasound. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register (searched 19 September 2016); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; the Cochrane Library 2016, Issue 8); Ovid MEDLINE (including In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, MEDLINE Daily and Epub Ahead of Print) (1946 to 19 September 2016); Ovid Embase (1974 to 19 September 2016); and EBSCO CINAHL Plus (1937 to 19 September 2016). We also searched three clinical trials registries and the references of included studies and relevant systematic reviews. There were no restrictions based on language, date of publication or study setting. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared ultrasound with no ultrasound. Eligible non-ultrasound comparator treatments included usual care, sham ultrasound and alternative leg ulcer treatments. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed the search results and selected eligible studies. Details from included studies were summarised using a data extraction sheet, and double-checked. We attempted to contact trial authors for missing data. MAIN RESULTS: Eleven trials are included in this update; 10 of these we judged to be at an unclear or high risk of bias. The trials were clinically heterogeneous with differences in duration of follow-up, and ultrasound regimens. Nine trials evaluated high frequency ultrasound; seven studies provided data for ulcers healed and two provided data on change in ulcer size only. Two trials evaluated low frequency ultrasound and both reported ulcers healed data.It is uncertain whether high frequency ultrasound affects the proportion of ulcers healed compared with no ultrasound at any of the time points evaluated: at seven to eight weeks (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.71; 6 trials, 678 participants; low quality evidence - downgraded once for risk of bias and once for imprecision); at 12 weeks (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.73; 3 trials, 489 participants; moderate quality evidence - downgraded once for imprecision); and at 12 months (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.18; 1 trial, 337 participants; low quality evidence - downgraded once for unclear risk of bias and once for imprecision).One trial (92 participants) reported that a greater percentage reduction in ulcer area was achieved at four weeks with high-frequency ultrasound, while another (73 participants) reported no clear difference in change in ulcer size at seven weeks. We downgraded the level of this evidence to very low, mainly for risk of bias (typically lack of blinded outcome assessment and attrition) and imprecision.Data from one trial (337 participants) suggest that high frequency ultrasound may increase the risk of non-serious adverse events (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.64; moderate quality evidence - downgraded once for imprecision) and serious adverse events (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.89; moderate quality evidence downgraded once for imprecision).It is uncertain whether low frequency ultrasound affects venous ulcer healing at eight and 12 weeks (RR 3.91, 95% CI 0.47 to 32.85; 2 trials, 61 participants; very low quality evidence (downgraded for risk of bias and imprecision)).High-frequency ultrasound probably makes little or no difference to quality of life (moderate quality evidence, downgraded for imprecision). The outcomes of adverse effects, quality of life and cost were not reported for low-frequency ultrasound treatment. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: It is uncertain whether therapeutic ultrasound (either high or low frequency) improves the healing of venous leg ulcers. We rated most of the evidence as low or very low quality due to risk of bias and imprecision.

Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound upregulates pro-myelination indicators of Schwann cells enhanced by co-culture with adipose-derived stem cells.

OBJECTIVES: Peripheral nerve injuries are a common occurrence, resulting in considerable patient suffering; it also represents a major economic burden on society. To improve treatment options following peripheral nerve injuries, scientists aim to find a way to promote Schwann cell (SC) myelination to help nerves to carry out their functions effectively. In this study, we investigated myelination ability of SCs, regulated by co-culture with adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) or low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS), and synergistic effects of combined treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Schwann cells were co-cultured with or without ASCs, and either left untreated or treated with LIPUS for 10 min/d for 1, 4 or 7 days. Effects of LIPUS and ASC co-culture on pro-myelination indicators of SCs were analysed by real-time PCR (RT-PCR), Western blotting and immunofluorescence staining (IF). RESULTS: Our results indicate that ASC-SC co-culture and LIPUS, together or individually, promoted mRNA levels of epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (EGFR3/ErbB3), neuregulin1 (NRG1), early growth response protein 2 (Egr2/Krox20) and myelin basic protein (MBP), with corresponding increases in protein levels of ErbB3, NRG1 and Krox20. Interestingly, combination of ASC-SC co-culture and LIPUS displayed the most remarkable effects. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that ASCs upregulated pro-myelination indicators of SCs by indirect contact (through co-culture) and that effects could be potentiated by LIPUS. We conclude that LIPUS, as a mechanical stress, may have potential in nerve regeneration with potential clinical relevance.

Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) can decrease the economic burden of fracture non-union.

OBJECTIVES: Few studies have evaluated the economic burden of surgical and conservative treatment of fracture non-union. An analysis was undertaken of aggregated payer data to determine economic costs of non-unions treated with surgery only vs non-unions treated conservatively with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) only. METHODS: This study used administrative claims from a health plan database including nearly 80 million people. Patients with a claim for non-union surgery or LIPUS for non-union were identified, from April 2007 until April 2010. A retrospective cohort was formed by pairwise demographic matching among patients who received 'Surgery Only' or 'LIPUS Only'. Date of the first non-union intervention (surgery or LIPUS) was defined as the index date. All medical costs were assessed over 12 months following the index date for the 'Surgery Only' and 'LIPUS Only' cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 1158 matched patients were identified. 'Surgery Only' patients used significantly more healthcare services. In the year following intervention, 'Surgery Only' patients had total medical costs $6289 higher than 'LIPUS Only' patients (Mean = $11,276 vs $4986; p < 0.0001). Outpatient costs accounted for >68% of overall costs in both cohorts, and outpatient costs were significantly higher among the 'Surgery Only' cohort (Mean = $7682 vs $4196; p < 0.0001). Total inpatient costs were also significantly higher among the 'Surgery Only' cohort (Mean = $3302 vs $381; p < 0.0001). LIMITATIONS: Limitations of this work are typical of all studies based on administrative claims data: errors in the database are assumed to distribute randomly between cohorts, and some patients may have been miscoded as to treatment received or costs billed. CONCLUSIONS: 'Surgery Only' patients used significantly and substantially more healthcare services in treatment of fracture non-union. Conservative treatment with 'LIPUS only' for fracture non-union could potentially result in cost savings projected to roughly $1 billion dollars [corrected].